oldtimer

According to Tipico Sportsbook, Kansas City will be a 4.5-point favorite over Cincinnati with an over/under point total of 48.5 points scored. The money line is -220 for the Chiefs and +175 for the Bengals. Both Kansas City and Cincinnati are 8-7 against the spread this season.

Thats hold water to be sure.. that plane ride from LA musta been 4 hrs in a giant Petri dish

could also be a huge disadvantage if the players think they can go out and come back testing positive. I think it'd be easier without the Bye to convince them to live in a bubble.

well whatever you do dont tell them about us but then probably a few of our "ex members" are there.

post the link

the ya gotta love real time TV

well against one of the worst running defenses and a broken Watt they better of. In reality even without Kelce the game should of looked more like the Cowboys / Redskins game

I'm coming around to the thought of having O players not names Hill or Kelce playing ..Patrick needs to realize there are others out there

the soap box is for the LR..not that I disagree witcha

hard to think the game will happen much like last year

not sure "off the ledge is" appropriate but one individual certainly didn't know what he was talking about Lamardirts .."not impressed" Lamardirts.."Hitchens 2.0" Cranjis..."meh"

Great point

that plane must of been an incubator. Andy and Company probably have to as well so how many games /paychecks do they forfeit?

lol that struggle is real

Chiefs best be up by 35 points at the 1/2or the Steelers will find away to make it too close for comfort and now with COVID .. what should of been a sleeper will now be a hair puller outer. game will be decided by 3points or less

thanks for the clarification..regardless it aint good

I heard last night 47 players through out the league are on the list

why cant these children sit their stupid asses at home for the next few weeks? Give me their $$ and I'd lock my self in a 4x4 closet for 6 weeks Super Bowl will be played with at least 1 back up QB ..mark my words

IF the Chiefs sign him it better be for a pro rated Vet minimum and stick him on the practice squad . At his point he would be the 6th DB..maybe. On the radio they were reading aloud his tweets.. the guy is a bonified moron

x's 2

Actually I kinda am. Not that I pay that much attention but I'm rooting for anyone not the Rams nor Buccs for the NFC going to the SB. Our AZ lives in the belly of that beast I wonder what the locals are thinking.

it aint over yet

Steelers are most certainly a 2nd 1/2 team.. they really have turned things around. Their Pass rush is legit

You could say that again. Due to his on-field inconsistency, Breeland was not in the position make any mistakes outside of games. He did that in practice this week. By doing so, the Vikings had no choice but to get rid of him. When Minnesota made that decision, it confirmed what we already knew: the team signing Breeland originally was a mistake. He has a PFF grade of 47.2 this year. He has two picks and five passes defended, but his six touchdowns allowed in just 13 games is tied for the most in his career. Breeland signed late in free agency. Chris Tomasson of the Pioneer Press reported that Breeland expected to compete for a starting spot out wide. The cornerback struggled in the preseason. Despite that, he earned the starting position over second-year cornerback Cameron Dantzler, Granted, Dantzler didn’t look great in the preseason, either. But in hindsight, the Vikings could have started Dantzler and let the young corner develop with more experience. Instead, Minnesota got up-and-down performances from a cornerback who’s no longer on the team. The move to get Breeland could be rationalized at the time — more cornerback depth is never a bad thing. However, knowing what we know now, the Vikings should not have signed Breeland.