Nice try
On this particular play, it was the Field Judge who had primary responsibility. That responsibility was:
*ensure the ball carrier stayed in bounds as the play developed
*determine position of the ball if/when it crosses the plane
*ensure ball carrier's position as in bounds the moment the ball crosses the plane
*determine the ball carrier as having possession as the ball crosses the plane
Now, it must also be pointed out that the helmet to helmet contact was not egregious in that both players were attacking the same position on the field (the pylon) with the FJ focusing on the goal line, the plane, the pylon, the football, and the ball carrier's feet.
All of this, in the course of 1.8 seconds.
And you're bitching because the Field Judge, in spite of his PRIMARY duties, wasn't able to determine the INTENT of the tackler, which is the spirit of the targeting rule.
Good luck with that.