Honestly, I don't care who they get. If a DE falls like Van Ness, Smith etc I would prefer that. I do think we go OT later as it seems they like Niang. Now an offensive weapon would be sweet in any round imo. If they go RB, great. One that is compared to JC and if he lives up to it....even better.
Hopkins may be a guy we go after the draft is over with and it is their plan. We can still add TE too. Imagine a Gibbs, Hopkins, a good TE for this year. Developmental OT type and a RT/G later too in that injured USC guy. DT/DE is still high in my list though and I think one does fall to late teens/early 20s for us. If we move up to grab one, awesome.
Maybe we stand pat in the first, grab our guy and move up in the 2nd for Gibbs. I think he will be there early 2nd round for us. If they want him though, I think he would be there at our 31st pick. So, we may stay and grab a DE, DT or WR type if they don't want Hopkins. Then trade up in 2nd to get Gibbs? Would that be more preferable?