Jump to content

Chiefs trade for LB Lee from Jets


Recommended Posts

 
  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
 
 
4 minutes ago, FANATIC said:

 Hope this works out. Would have liked Collins instead.

Well Lee is 232 pounds so he probably plays the William's or O Daniel role.  Be good to have depth then whoever he takes for a spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/player/27270/

 

Ourlads' Profile:

2016 Guide: What Ourlads' NFL Scouting Services said about DARRON LEE: Ohio State, 6006 232 4.47. Junior entry from New Albany, OH. Started 28 games over his career. In two years he was in on 147 tackles, including 27.5 for loss. He scored three defensive touchdowns in his career. In the 2016 Fiesta Bowl he made 7 tackles, 2 sacks, a forced fumble, and a quarterback hurry. Normally reads and fits the inside holes well. Has a quick punch with his hands and can get separation. Flashes ability to redirect off a block. Has very good agility and can get through the wash. Has an explosive burst, coming out of a shuffle or changing directions. Blitzes gaps well and has a burst chasing with good range in pursuit. Is normally a secure tackler adjusting to movement and cuts in space. Takes very good pass drops and recognizes run pass quickly. Tough to fool as he reacts well to play action pass, getting in the throwing lane. Good re-route of receivers. He can cover the inside pass catchers. Tends to struggle more in the box. A powerful lineman can knock him off the ball. Has outstanding ability to change gears and recover when out of position. Possesses very good tools and elite athletic ability. Needs better strength and consistency in technique. Projects as a 4-3 outside linebacker. 2015 stats: 66 T, 11 TFL, 4.5 sacks, 1 INT, 2 FR. Edge speed:left 2.08, right 2.01. OSR:2/58. First round. (A-33 1/4, H-9 3/4, BP-17, SS-4.20).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 

 Good coverage LB, not great against the run.  Seems to be another O Daniel? Graded out good for pff.  Reading on him a bit, seems to not like to make contact at point of attack. Hopefully a change of scenery and being able to play in a new system works for us.

 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/darron-lee/10654

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I’ve been complaining about our lack of diversity and coverage ability at linebacker for a while. Nice pickup by Veach. Improving former first round young guy too if they can get him to buy in could become good starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
3 minutes ago, liquidfriend said:

They could kick Lee in at weakside, Hitchens at Mike and just gotta figure out strongside after that.

Trade Ragland for some big league chew.

Idk if Lee will start at WIL.  But, with him and DO’D there, it pretty much assures that Hitch will play MIKE. I was worried that Rags would get a shot to start there.  He is just depth now, if he sticks at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
6 minutes ago, SEMO said:

Idk if Lee will start at WIL.  But, with him and DO’D there, it pretty much assures that Hitch will play MIKE. I was worried that Rags would get a shot to start there.  He is just depth now, if he sticks at all.

I think DoD will continue to be your sub package specialist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
 
 

William's will be SLB. DOD I believe is the better pass rusher out of him and Lee but Lee is the better pass coverage guy. It may come down to situational at times but whoever can show they can defend against the run may take the starting spot. Lee should have an edge right now due to experience itself at the LB position and game time play

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Just now, Iluvhouse24 said:

CBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCB

PP for our late first and we will be set. Ward or Breeland opposite of him and move Fuller back into slot. Then time to start all in house contract extensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
10 minutes ago, kkuenn said:

PP for our late first and we will be set. Ward or Breeland opposite of him and move Fuller back into slot. Then time to start all in house contract extensions.

Whether it’s Peterson or not, Veach is now one corner away from completely transforming defense.  He’s gotta get that piece before I’ll pile on accolades. But if he does, it’s been a pretty extraordinary offseason for him.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
5 minutes ago, Mloe68 said:

Whether it’s Peterson or not, Veach is now one corner away from completely transforming defense.  He’s gotta get that piece before I’ll pile on accolades. But if he does, it’s been a pretty extraordinary offseason for him.  

 

We still have some cap room. Sucks that Mo Claiborne is the best available FA CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
4 hours ago, Mloe68 said:

Whether it’s Peterson or not, Veach is now one corner away from completely transforming defense.  He’s gotta get that piece before I’ll pile on accolades. But if he does, it’s been a pretty extraordinary offseason for him.  

 

I feel like they have a definite direction here, and I like it.  I could be wrong, but this is how I interpret the building of the defense.  There's going to be less emphasis on edge rushers.  We are going to stock guys in the back 7 that can cover and knock receivers off of routes, but also speedier guys.  This in turn leaves me believing that there's going to be a bit of creativity within the defensive scheme, going back to my first point about less emphasis on pure edge rushers.  I'm thinking a Steelers style defense, cover the receivers, disguise your blitzers, and run varying zone blitzes to try to keep the QB uncomfortable.  I don't look for this team to be overly stout against the run, but much improved from last year, I'm guess in the 15-20 ranking league wide.  I think it's going to be vastly improved against the pass, and this whole thing is by design.  Our offense is going to score points.  Lots of points.  I think the overall plan here is to win track meets, as we have an unreal QB who is a year more experienced, so the goal is for the offense to take the opposing running game off the table, while the defense creatively finds ways to pressure the QB, and get nasty on the turnovers.  I could be wrong, but this is just how it seems to me the plan is falling out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
  • Create New...