FANATIC 852 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 https://arrowheadaddict.com/2019/06/05/jordy-nelson-willing-unretire-play-kansas-city-chiefs/ Good stats last season in Oakland. 15 88 63 739 11.7 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qnet 1,159 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 I've always liked Nelson, it's a shame the Chiefs couldn't have got him when he left GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamardirts 2,124 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 I’d take him over some of the other guys in FA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,220 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 He's pretty done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reesebobby 5,664 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 51 minutes ago, xen said: He's pretty done Not disagreeing, but he had 63 for 739 last year. Playing for the Raiders. I think he'd be better than somebody we'll be trucking out there this year. And probably a good mentor for Hardman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted June 5, 2019 Author Share Posted June 5, 2019 1 hour ago, xen said: He's pretty done Hardly. 63 for 739 on that pathetic Raiders Offense. I would add him for one year. KC is one injury away from receiver nightmare. Not certain Hill we be available or when. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CranjisMcbasketball 781 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Thinking slightly outside the box i think he could play the role kelce does and be a great backup slot tight end. let be honest kelce is rarely asked to block and nelson is a big wr , wouldn’t be a big adjustment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefmanzada 466 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 I like what we got pending Hill investigation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,220 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 4 hours ago, FANATIC said: Hardly. 63 for 739 on that pathetic Raiders Offense. I would add him for one year. KC is one injury away from receiver nightmare. Not certain Hill we be available or when. He said himself he's sitting around getting fat. He's talking playing 1 more year. All that does is keep a promising youngster from game reps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted June 6, 2019 Author Share Posted June 6, 2019 29 minutes ago, xen said: He said himself he's sitting around getting fat. He's talking playing 1 more year. All that does is keep a promising youngster from game reps. He was kidding about fat. Promising Youngster vs a Proven Veteran on a Superbowl Team? Last years production proves he is still a viable option. I am sure there is room on a 53 man roster for this guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balto 723 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Super Bowl or bust! I’d take TO if he could play better than our 4th guy if it meant able better shot at winning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WichitaZRide 321 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 We hold all the cards...he wants to be here and he’s “retired”. Give him a shot with vet minimum and no guaranteed money...make him earn a roster spot like anyone else...option worth exploring. Also, as someone else said...convert the guy to TE. Both to backup Kelce and for 2 TE sets. I’d love to see those two roaming the middle together. One of them is bound to be open Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mloe68 1,521 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Agree with sentiment if we had any real interest, we would have signed him before he retired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhitter 1,426 Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 On 6/6/2019 at 9:26 AM, Mloe68 said: Agree with sentiment if we had any real interest, we would have signed him before he retired. Yep. Threads like this remind me of the old Chiefs days. Every time someone was cut, retired, up for trade, whatever....Chiefs fan were like "Should we go after this guy"? Didn't matter the circumstances or even if they could play any more lol. The Chiefs offense is good enough with what we have to compete for a title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted June 9, 2019 Author Share Posted June 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, dhitter said: Yep. Threads like this remind me of the old Chiefs days. Every time someone was cut, retired, up for trade, whatever....Chiefs fan were like "Should we go after this guy"? Didn't matter the circumstances or even if they could play any more lol. The Chiefs offense is good enough with what we have to compete for a title. One injury away from not so good. Hill may or may not play. Good insurance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mloe68 1,521 Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 1 minute ago, dhitter said: Yep. Threads like this remind me of the old Chiefs days. Every time someone was cut, retired, up for trade, whatever....Chiefs fan were like "Should we go after this guy"? Didn't matter the circumstances or even if they could play any more lol. The Chiefs offense is good enough with what we have to compete for a title. I think Brett Veach has shown he thinks there’s more value in trading for young first contract guys with unproven upside over signing fourth contract veterans. Doesn’t mean he won’t do it, but it’s probably really going to have to be a fit (Like Ben Watson) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WichitaZRide 321 Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 1 hour ago, dhitter said: Yep. Threads like this remind me of the old Chiefs days. Every time someone was cut, retired, up for trade, whatever....Chiefs fan were like "Should we go after this guy"? Didn't matter the circumstances or even if they could play any more lol. The Chiefs offense is good enough with what we have to compete for a title. I would argue that every fan base does this...the only difference here is the guy flat out said he would only play here, so yeah the conversation is an easy one to bring up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted June 10, 2019 Author Share Posted June 10, 2019 Super Bowl Champion Experience and good stats last year...played 15 games 63 catches 739 yards 11.7 yards per catch and 3 tds on a pathetic Raider Offense 15 63 88 739 11.7 3 66 36 0 He could clearly help this team on a one year Super Bowl Season..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,210 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 10 minutes ago, FANATIC said: Super Bowl Champion Experience and good stats last year...played 15 games 63 catches 739 yards 11.7 yards per catch and 3 tds on a pathetic Raider Offense 15 63 88 739 11.7 3 66 36 0 He could clearly help this team on a one year Super Bowl Season..... If Hill plays at least the majority of games this season, there's no need for Nelson. He might have the experience factor, but no future here and I don's see him as a game changer compared to Hill, Watson, Hardman, Robinson, and Pringle with Kemp, Dieter, Curtis, and Thompson thrown into the mix. Save the roster spot to develop Watson's replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted June 10, 2019 Author Share Posted June 10, 2019 45 minutes ago, jetlord said: If Hill plays at least the majority of games this season, there's no need for Nelson. He might have the experience factor, but no future here and I don's see him as a game changer compared to Hill, Watson, Hardman, Robinson, and Pringle with Kemp, Dieter, Curtis, and Thompson thrown into the mix. Save the roster spot to develop Watson's replacement. Robinson had done little in 2 years and had shots last year to show something. Pringle , Kemp etc are potential at best. We agree to disagree. Nelson is certainly more valuable this year than Dieter, Curtis or Thompson. Not to mention Watkins is a walking injury in waiting. Hill out 4-6-8 games? Who Knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balto 723 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 2 hours ago, jetlord said: If Hill plays at least the majority of games this season, there's no need for Nelson. He might have the experience factor, but no future here and I don's see him as a game changer compared to Hill, Watson, Hardman, Robinson, and Pringle with Kemp, Dieter, Curtis, and Thompson thrown into the mix. Save the roster spot to develop Watson's replacement. Nelson would of been our #2 WR last year with his 63 catches and 739 yards and over double what Demarcus and Conley did! I agree about developing young talent BUT not at the risk of a Super Bowl birth. Hill misses time......Sammy gets hurt......Gratz Hardman and Demarcus as targets to the best QB in the NFL! What a waste. just to be clear, I’m not saying give Jordy $10M a year..no! I’m saying if he wants to come play on cheap contract it would be a much welcome addition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,210 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 52 minutes ago, Balto said: Nelson would of been our #2 WR last year with his 63 catches and 739 yards and over double what Demarcus and Conley did! I agree about developing young talent BUT not at the risk of a Super Bowl birth. Hill misses time......Sammy gets hurt......Gratz Hardman and Demarcus as targets to the best QB in the NFL! What a waste. just to be clear, I’m not saying give Jordy $10M a year..no! I’m saying if he wants to come play on cheap contract it would be a much welcome addition Sorry, I just don't see Nelson at this point being the difference in the SB or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.