FANATIC 852 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 On 8/31/2019 at 6:11 PM, qnet said: This is a borderline fleecing by Veach , LOL. Aaron Wilson @AaronWilson_NFL 4m4 minutes ago More Tim Kelly on the running game: and Carlos Hyde @elguapo 'Carlos is running hard, running behind his pads, good job of finishing his runs. He's brought a physical element to our running game.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, FANATIC said: Aaron Wilson @AaronWilson_NFL 4m4 minutes ago More Tim Kelly on the running game: and Carlos Hyde @elguapo 'Carlos is running hard, running behind his pads, good job of finishing his runs. He's brought a physical element to our running game.' Still we fleeced them. Got a good former higher pick for the OL for a guy we were going to cut. It has been 2 games and Hyde has been playing hungry and angry. I still think not only did we get a trade for him but it also worked out where we got Shady too! FANATIC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 1 minute ago, kkuenn said: Still we fleeced them. Got a good former higher pick for the OL for a guy we were going to cut. It has been 2 games and Hyde has been playing hungry and angry. I still think not only did we get a trade for him but it also worked out where we got Shady too! Could be. Hope you are correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 Just now, FANATIC said: Could be. Hope you are correct. Hey think of it this way. We all knew Hyde was getting cut. If we had allowed it and he did this, then I could see the revisionist history type thing. Hyde would be tearing it up for another team and we received nothing for it. Thing is, he did not play all that well from what we as fans saw on TV. The coaches saw him from day 1 and did not think he would fit. I just hope we can turn that high picked OL into a beast of a G or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 13 minutes ago, kkuenn said: Hey think of it this way. We all knew Hyde was getting cut. If we had allowed it and he did this, then I could see the revisionist history type thing. Hyde would be tearing it up for another team and we received nothing for it. Thing is, he did not play all that well from what we as fans saw on TV. The coaches saw him from day 1 and did not think he would fit. I just hope we can turn that high picked OL into a beast of a G or something. Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Handswarmer 645 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 Fleecing is what DeCosta did to Minny- a 5th for a kicker we were going to cut who they then cut a week later and then got cut by the Jets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reesebobby 5,661 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 17 hours ago, Handswarmer said: Fleecing is what DeCosta did to Minny- a 5th for a kicker we were going to cut who they then cut a week later and then got cut by the Jets! I was wondering about whether the Ravens somehow did it better than we did. I assumed so, but it's good to know for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WichitaZRide 321 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 For me it is what it is. We all know that Hyde was gonna get cut if we didn't trade him. We also know that someone else must have been interested or Houston wouldn't have traded for him. Its not like he would have been available to us now anyway since he is on a team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Guess Not so much C. Hyde 26 116 1 26 16 D. Watson 8 44 2 10 28 D. Johnson 5 34 Carlos Hyde has been an absolute beast for the #Texans in 2019. The move was an after thought at the time because all the attention was on the Tunsil trade but give O’Brien credit because that move has been tremendous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qnet 1,150 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, FANATIC said: Guess Not so much C. Hyde 26 116 1 26 16 D. Watson 8 44 2 10 28 D. Johnson 5 34 Carlos Hyde has been an absolute beast for the #Texans in 2019. The move was an after thought at the time because all the attention was on the Tunsil trade but give O’Brien credit because that move has been tremendous. Guess not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 On 8/31/2019 at 4:09 PM, Mloe68 said: We get the Texans 2018 3rd round pick Martinas Rankin. Likely a guard but can play anywhere on oline. Apology if previously reported. Would have been better to actually get a 3rd round pick. No worries KC has 21 million in cap space, Frank Clark, Anthony Hitchens, Sammy Watkins and dont need the second round pick they gave up next year. Veach Rules. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIChiefsFan 262 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, qnet said: Guess not. Yeah but look at what Rankin has done for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefensiveMan 758 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Kendrall Bell = Frank Clark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KC Warpaint 3,234 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 23 minutes ago, DefensiveMan said: Kendrall Bell = Frank Clark. can't argue this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegoatee 1,780 Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Hyde schematically didn’t work here and obviously was in a do or die situation on his like 5th team? It is just tiresome where we make every team look like they have a hall of famer back there. FANATIC and oldtimer 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mloe68 1,521 Posted October 14, 2019 Author Share Posted October 14, 2019 7 hours ago, FANATIC said: Would have been better to actually get a 3rd round pick. No worries KC has 21 million in cap space, Frank Clark, Anthony Hitchens, Sammy Watkins and dont need the second round pick they gave up next year. Veach Rules. LOL. Seagrams Golden Wine Coolers. You clearly love em! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artsy 1,137 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Mloe68 said: Seagrams Golden Wine Coolers. You clearly love em! Lol..wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhitter 1,424 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 I predicted Hyde would run for a buck twenty five and a TD. Dang I was almost right on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 1 minute ago, dhitter said: I predicted Hyde would run for a buck twenty five and a TD. Dang I was almost right on it. It was magic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qnet 1,150 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, FANATIC said: It was magic. Fanatic, I get that you don't like Veach as GM or the Hyde deal., but do you like being right more than the Chiefs actually winning? Do you think the Chiefs would be better off if they had kept Hyde? I'm not sure they would have, because Reid wouldn't have ran him anyway. I'm not trying to throw shade, just curious. I stated it was a borderline fleecing , but maybe the Chiefs got fleeced, LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, qnet said: Fanatic, I get that you don't like Veach as GM or the Hyde deal., but do you like being right more than the Chiefs actually winning? Do you think the Chiefs would be better off if they had kept Hyde? I'm not sure they would have, because Reid wouldn't have ran him anyway. I'm not trying to throw shade, just curious. I stated it was a borderline fleecing , but maybe the Chiefs got fleeced, LOL. It was a good trade because Hyde was going to be cut anyways. End of that discussion really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 12 minutes ago, qnet said: Fanatic, I get that you don't like Veach as GM or the Hyde deal., but do you like being right more than the Chiefs actually winning? Do you think the Chiefs would be better off if they had kept Hyde? I'm not sure they would have, because Reid wouldn't have ran him anyway. I'm not trying to throw shade, just curious. I stated it was a borderline fleecing , but maybe the Chiefs got fleeced, LOL. Hyde was gone no doubt. At least they got something. It was not Veach Magic though. I did not dislike the Hyde deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhitter 1,424 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 6 hours ago, FANATIC said: Hyde was gone no doubt. At least they got something. It was not Veach Magic though. I did not dislike the Hyde deal. Frankly, it could have been Hyde from That 70s Show and he still would have run for 100+ and a TD. This defense blows that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sith13 1,746 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Hyde would have been cut so we basically got something out of nothing. Pretty good deal IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FANATIC 852 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 1 hour ago, sith13 said: Hyde would have been cut so we basically got something out of nothing. Pretty good deal IMO. Good deal for both teams. Hoping Rankin works out well. sith13 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now