Chiefsfan1963 1,101 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Greener grass on the otherside of the fence. When the players play on your team and struggle they suck and need to be replaced. When they are replaced and plays well in a few games for their new team people point out that the Chiefs shouldn't have gotten rid of them. qnet and FANATIC 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 11 minutes ago, Chiefsfan1963 said: Greener grass on the otherside of the fence. When the players play on your team and struggle they suck and need to be replaced. When they are replaced and plays well in a few games for their new team people point out that the Chiefs shouldn't have gotten rid of them. Basically. If they had kept them "wow we overpaid for a brokedick like Dee Ford and kept an old declining expensive Houston. Why didn't Veach make a bold move like trade for Frank Clark?????????" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,220 Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 it's funny cause it's all true. Calichief 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etcreative 6 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 23 hours ago, FANATIC said: Houston said he was not approached by KC to rework his deal. We will never know if he would have taken the same deal he got from the Colts to stay in KC. That is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now