Green Bay

[Docbarnabee 225]

Watching the Green Bay game. I am think we can move it on them. They can't cover Tth Raiders TE. Ran the ball well.  

Oakland just is not playing good Defense. Our D is going to have to step up big. Otherwise, it could be a long day.

[DefensiveMan 758]

It's all about that defense. If they bring the same intensity and discipline as last week it'll be a game. Reid, will have a nice gameplan for Matt Moore. As much as we bash Reid , let's be honest...is there anyone else you would want coaching a backup QB?

[Biggjliv4 1,292]

I hope we dink and dunk, focus on run game,  and let Moore look deep for Hill every 15 or so plays 

D will demonstrate if Denver was an illusion real quickly 

[Docbarnabee 225]

Defense will have to bring pressure and play tight coverage as well as stop the run. Tall order. Green Bay offensively looked good. Then again they were playing the Raiders. Should be a great game.

[Chiefsfan1963 1,101]

I think the D will want to show the home crowd that they aren't that bad. I believe they will dial it up.

[Calichief 3,016]

Smash them in the mouth. More FB designed plays. Dink and dunk 

[Balto 723]

Rodgers sucks when you hit him.  If he stays clean he will light us up.  MUST pressure Rodgers

[azchief21 5,278]

If we blitz like we did against Statue Flacco, with our DBs in man, Rodgers will hang up 50

[Balto 723]

11 minutes ago, azchief21 said:

If we blitz like we did against Statue Flacco, with our DBs in man, Rodgers will hang up 50

If you sit back he will hang 60.

[moons314 2,463]

12 minutes ago, azchief21 said:

If we blitz like we did against Statue Flacco, with our DBs in man, Rodgers will hang up 50

You can blitz without playing man.  You can do a lot of different things.  Not every blitz is a cover 0. 

[Docbarnabee 225]

Rogers looked really good, but Oakland put zero pressure on him.

Oakland moved the ball fairly easily on the Packers in the first Half until Oakland went down by 3 scores.  When they had to concentrate more on the pass, they had issues.

I believe the Chiefs Offense will give Green Bay a lot of issues.  Even with Moore at QB.  I think he will be much improved after getting the reps in practice this week.

Defense is going to have to get pressure and stop the run.  If Devonte Adams is not back, I think we can handle their receivers.   If he is back, it could be trouble.

[Calichief 3,016]

2 hours ago, Docbarnabee said:

Rogers looked really good, but Oakland put zero pressure on him.

Oakland moved the ball fairly easily on the Packers in the first Half until Oakland went down by 3 scores.  When they had to concentrate more on the pass, they had issues.

I believe the Chiefs Offense will give Green Bay a lot of issues.  Even with Moore at QB.  I think he will be much improved after getting the reps in practice this week.

Defense is going to have to get pressure and stop the run.  If Devonte Adams is not back, I think we can handle their receivers.   If he is back, it could be trouble.

Meh, their wr are just ok imo.

[qnet 1,150]

I agree with Doc. It won't be easy but Reid can be really good at  gameplanning. I hope they stay with the same formula they used against Denver. Keep running the ball, even if they get stuffed a few times. Having Hill back is huge because he forces defenders to account for him.

The Broncos offense is bad, but people forget how good their defense is. 

The key is the Chiefs defense. They're going to have to play like they did against the Broncos and be consistent. 

I'm not a betting man, but it's crazy that the line is basically even for this game. That shows you the respect they have for Mahomes & Reid. 

[West 6,713]

This will be a huge test for the Defense.

I think Reid and the O can put up 24 on their D.

This should be a very competitive game and could be a Super Bowl Preview.

I still see it coming down to Packers vs Niners & Chiefs vs Pats.

w

[Mloe68 1,521]

This will be only the third time the Chiefs have been underdogs at Arrowhead since 2013.  Vegas doesn’t like our chances. I don’t either. But that’s why you play the game!

[DefensiveMan 758]

10 hours ago, azchief21 said:

If we blitz like we did against Statue Flacco, with our DBs in man, Rodgers will hang up 50

Timely blitzes and stunts.

[xen 1,010,220]

Hate to say it but I don't like our chances this week against Old Man Mahomes and the Pack.  I like us much better the other 3 weeks before the bye.

[oldtimer 8,686]

I had us an a lose anyway in my preseason figuring

[Mloe68 1,521]

14 minutes ago, xen said:

Hate to say it but I don't like our chances this week against Old Man Mahomes and the Pack.  I like us much better the other 3 weeks before the bye.

If you look at the AFC West schedules the next 3 weeks there not be more than 2 wins about the entire bunch. And 1 of those is because the Chargers and Broncos play each other. Maybe nothing more important than getting healthy the next month. One bi product of losing our MVP is that hopefully he won't have to play behind a line that doesn't have Fisher any more this season. What we really do need now however is Watkins. A lot easier to make single reads if you have both WRs. 

[Biggjliv4 1,292]

I see this as a loss for the game, but I really hope the defense prove me wrong about Denver being a fluke. If D plays well and we run the ball I consider it an overall team win. 

[xen 1,010,220]

Man I almost bought tix to this game just to see Mahomes vs Old Man Mahomes.  Glad I didn't.

[Lamardirts 2,114]

Maybe I’m a little pessimistic about the W-Ls.  If we can get 1 in the next 4 that should be enough.  I am optimistic because of what y’all are saying about they team rallying and that will make us better in the end.   

[Chiefsfan1963 1,101]

As it is right now, KC is:

2 games up on the Raiders with a head to head win in their house. Outside of KC and Houston, the Raiders don't play another team with more than 3 wins. Hypothetically speaking, if the Raiders lost to Houston and KC and beat the rest of the teams on their schedule they would end up 11-5.

3 games up on the Doncos with a head to head win in their house. Personally I don't see Denver winning another game, maybe beat Cleveland in Denver. They have Indy, Minn, Buf, Chargers, Houston, KC, Det and Oakland. 2-14 maybe 3-13

3 games up on the Chargers with 2 games to play against the Chiefs. The way they have been playing I would say they lose to Chicago, GB, Oakland, Min, KC giving them 10 losses. Even if they don't lose another game the best they could do is 11-5 which I highly doubt.

I see KC winning the division and with Indys weak schedule settling with a 3rd seed and playing Houston in the first round.

NE, INDY, KC, BALT, BUFF and HOU

But anything could happen. 

[Mloe68 1,521]

3 hours ago, Biggjliv4 said:

I see this as a loss for the game, but I really hope the defense prove me wrong about Denver being a fluke. If D plays well and we run the ball I consider it an overall team win. 

Defense could actually play well or at least continue to show improvement and still give up 24 plus points. I'm guessing that where we need this game in the 20s. Our next two opponents are very good teams and I think one of them is going to get the book thrown at them in an attempt to steal one and the other will probably be the worst home loss of the Reid era. Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but a 3rd string QB off the streets against Super Bowl contenders is a very tough task. I think Mahomes returns for Tennessee. 

[Mloe68 1,521]

51 minutes ago, Chiefsfan1963 said:

As it is right now, KC is:

2 games up on the Raiders with a head to head win in their house. Outside of KC and Houston, the Raiders don't play another team with more than 3 wins. Hypothetically speaking, if the Raiders lost to Houston and KC and beat the rest of the teams on their schedule they would end up 11-5.

3 games up on the Doncos with a head to head win in their house. Personally I don't see Denver winning another game, maybe beat Cleveland in Denver. They have Indy, Minn, Buf, Chargers, Houston, KC, Det and Oakland. 2-14 maybe 3-13

3 games up on the Chargers with 2 games to play against the Chiefs. The way they have been playing I would say they lose to Chicago, GB, Oakland, Min, KC giving them 10 losses. Even if they don't lose another game the best they could do is 11-5 which I highly doubt.

I see KC winning the division and with Indys weak schedule settling with a 3rd seed and playing Houston in the first round.

NE, INDY, KC, BALT, BUFF and HOU

But anything could happen. 

Personally I'd rather be the 4th seed and go to NE in the divisional round. May end up with the AFC Title game back here. Obviously being the 2 seed is still the realistic goal if we can win 1 of the next 2 and then get the MVP back.