Rodgers out versus chiefs

[kkuenn 3,599]

42 to 17! Chiefs.

[KC Warpaint 3,234]

Sorry, Buddy Love ain't AA- Ron

[KCSLC2008 606]

9 hours ago, DieHard said:

Dang. I prefer to get a teams best game and let the chips fall where they may.

I prefer to get a team’s best game and beat the shit out of them. But to each their own.

[KCSLC2008 606]

3 hours ago, qnet said:

I was looking forward to Mahomes vs. Rodgers in 2019, but not this year. I'm glad the Chiefs are catching a break, and hope they can take advantage of it.

Yes, it’s not very often in a team that is used to winning 10 to 13 games a year to be able to win a game they “shouldn’t“ to make up for losing a game that they should never have lost. If we win, I’m considering that CEH never fumbled versus Baltimore and the Packers game a loss to Rodgers that we’ll avenge in the Super Bowl.

[KCSLC2008 606]

2 hours ago, jetlord said:

Do you really think the Chiefs' offense can score 28?  Maybe with no turnovers, but I'm not hopeful. 

If I predicted last year that you would say that, you’d call me ridiculous or assume Mahomes was out. Unless you are doing a reverse jinx right now.

[jetlord 10,209]

1 hour ago, KCSLC2008 said:

If I predicted last year that you would say that, you’d call me ridiculous or assume Mahomes was out. Unless you are doing a reverse jinx right now.

We keep waiting for the offense to get back in sync but the last two games are so discouraging.  Some of Mahomes throws are not even a shell of what he's done the past three years.  That underthrow to Hill Monday night was something that never happened in the past.  We keep thinking the turnovers are just a bad spell but they keep coming.  Kelce is mugged every play and Hill is at least doubled but Pringle, Gordon, Gray, etc. get very few or no targets.  Something has to change, but when? 

[Fmbl2187 2,279]

Apparently Rogers took Ivermectin and called it as good as a vaccination.  Even though it didn't work, at least now we know he doesn't have anal worms.

[Fmbl2187 2,279]

On 11/3/2021 at 8:34 PM, KCSLC2008 said:

I prefer to get a team’s best game and beat the shit out of them. But to each their own.

Yeah, if we hope to get wins against teams with major injuries, what does that say about our chances in the playoffs (if we get there)?

[oldtimer 8,686]

I'm a bit tired of being embarrassed on Natl TV so I'm hoping that does not occur unless this team  is nothing like it looks like now

[DieHard 2,061]

This is a better offense than the last 2 games. Pat, Reek and Kelce are In a slump. They will break out of it and be who they are. 

[Calichief 3,016]

On 11/3/2021 at 5:45 PM, KC Warpaint said:

Sorry, Buddy Love ain't AA- Ron

Neither was Daniel Jones. Our offense needs to get rigjt. I’m not worried about their offense.

[mex 65,581]

On 11/3/2021 at 4:37 PM, 58shineson said:

I was excited for a second but remembered how the chiefs seem to always allow a backup play like a pro bowler. 

We do have a rather glorious history of doing just that, don't we.

[dhitter 1,424]

If the Packers commit to the run game and utilize the backs on screens and out routes I'm thinking they probably don't punt all day. If they try to get cutesie and put the game on Love to win it then it could be interesting.

[sith13 1,746]

The turnovers have mostly been mental mistakes and should be taken care of after the bye but if we can get rid of them beforehand I think we ride a decent offensive momentum to the playoffs. 

[azchief21 5,278]

1 hour ago, dhitter said:

If the Packers commit to the run game and utilize the backs on screens and out routes I'm thinking they probably don't punt all day. If they try to get cutesie and put the game on Love to win it then it could be interesting.

Nailed it

[Fmbl2187 2,279]

1 hour ago, azchief21 said:

Nailed it

Gay and Bolton might make that strategy not so great, in spite of GB's running tandem. Chiefs must merely do to them what other teams have been doing to us.  Play two high and rush the crap out of them.  Have to bracket Adams. For it to work, we need to take an early lead and force them into passing. Might not work until the second half.  Oh, and don't let Sorenson play on any possible passing downs.  Preferably not at all.

[xen 1,010,220]

17 minutes ago, Fmbl2187 said:

Gay and Bolton might make that strategy not so great, in spite of GB's running tandem. Chiefs must merely do to them what other teams have been doing to us.  Play two high and rush the crap out of them.  Have to bracket Adams. For it to work, we need to take an early lead and force them into passing. Might not work until the second half.  Oh, and don't let Sorenson play on any possible passing downs.  Preferably not at all.

Why would you need to play 2 high against a rook making his first start at qb.  That's lunacy.  Mix up and disguise your coverages and confuse the shit out of him while committing to stop the run.  

[sith13 1,746]

It would help us more if RPO was out instead of Rodgers. 

[Thegoatee 1,780]

If Andy stops running, he is a moron beyond belief…

[Thegoatee 1,780]

Great…… Wylie is in…

[sith13 1,746]

1 minute ago, Thegoatee said:

If Andy stops running, he is a moron beyond belief…

1st & goal yet there's no pro formation or FB on the field, RPO BS back to back. 

[Thegoatee 1,780]

Stupid. Damn. Shotgun. From. The. One.

[Obi Won Mahome 134]

Nice drive by the offense.

 

Defense did its job too.  
 

Good game for the Chiefs so far.

[moons314 2,463]

It’s subtle, but you can see the evolution of the offense.  The afc is full of teams with bad losses.  Don’t turn the ball over, win, and we’re still in the drivers seat. 

[moons314 2,463]

2 minutes ago, Thegoatee said:

Stupid. Damn. Shotgun. From. The. One.

Under center play action results in the score.  Go figure.