dhitter 1,424 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 38 minutes ago, Fmbl2187 said: Hill didn't leave for greener pastures. He was traded, wasn't he? Am I confused? The point being that the Chiefs didn't retain a key piece of the team in spite of Mahomes team friendly contract. Greener pastures was my phrase.....he did get traded and the pasture was greener so it isn't totally wrong lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,599 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 44 minutes ago, dhitter said: The point being that the Chiefs didn't retain a key piece of the team in spite of Mahomes team friendly contract. Greener pastures was my phrase.....he did get traded and the pasture was greener so it isn't totally wrong lol He did not want to sign with us and wanted the extra few million. He forced the hand so yes, he wanted the greener pasture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fmbl2187 2,279 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 1 hour ago, dhitter said: The point being that the Chiefs didn't retain a key piece of the team in spite of Mahomes team friendly contract. Greener pastures was my phrase.....he did get traded and the pasture was greener so it isn't totally wrong lol True. Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,209 Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 7 hours ago, Fmbl2187 said: Hill didn't leave for greener pastures. He was traded, wasn't he? Am I confused? He may not have asked for the trade. We'll never know the inside of it. Hill did go willingly and could have stayed if he was willing to play for what was a good contract offer from the Chiefs. The WR market went crazy last winter and Hill chose to capitalize on it. Don't blame him, but it isn't as if the Chiefs dumped him for cheaper players. So I would answer you post with "Yes" and "Yes" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fmbl2187 2,279 Posted August 5, 2022 Share Posted August 5, 2022 3 hours ago, jetlord said: He may not have asked for the trade. We'll never know the inside of it. Hill did go willingly and could have stayed if he was willing to play for what was a good contract offer from the Chiefs. The WR market went crazy last winter and Hill chose to capitalize on it. Don't blame him, but it isn't as if the Chiefs dumped him for cheaper players. So I would answer you post with "Yes" and "Yes" Yes, to that also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now