jetlord 10,207 Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 38 minutes ago, xen said: Obviously Nabors number 1. Guess he was a good catcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 9 hours ago, xen said: Obviously Nabors number 1. Shazam! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 8 Author Share Posted April 8 Ex-Texas Longhorns DL T'Vondre Sweat arrested for DWI Does he drop even further now? Would you want him end of round 2? https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/39895470/ex-texas-longhorns-dl-tvondre-sweat-arrested-dwi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,218 Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 48 minutes ago, kkuenn said: Ex-Texas Longhorns DL T'Vondre Sweat arrested for DWI Does he drop even further now? Would you want him end of round 2? https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/39895470/ex-texas-longhorns-dl-tvondre-sweat-arrested-dwi Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,218 Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 On a related note how much alcohol does that dude have to drink at his size to be over the limit? Lamardirts and oldtimer 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,207 Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 1 hour ago, kkuenn said: Ex-Texas Longhorns DL T'Vondre Sweat arrested for DWI Does he drop even further now? Would you want him end of round 2? https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/39895470/ex-texas-longhorns-dl-tvondre-sweat-arrested-dwi No! Not only stupid judgement, but how about trying to trim down a bit before OTAs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamardirts 2,114 Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 We need talent at IDL. I would take him at 64 if he was there. We could use an actual 1 tech that can handle double teams. Wonder if that will make him drop into the 3rd round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 8 Author Share Posted April 8 I see arm length greater than 34 inches....but you get the idea. oldtimer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 20 minutes ago, kkuenn said: I see arm length greater than 34 inches....but you get the idea. Yeah. i think Veach has actually commented that 34 minimum is a requirement of theirs for tackle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,218 Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 The consensus seems to be Barton will move inside to center or guard. Morgan iffy to stay outside. Some more: Amegadjie 36 1/8 Fisher 34 3/8 Foster 34 5/8 Christian Jones 34 1/2 Rosengarten 33 1/2 McCormick 33 7/8 Man, good year to need a tackle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 8 Author Share Posted April 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 8 Author Share Posted April 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted April 8 Share Posted April 8 Think I would be looking at feet instead of arms at the OT position. I know I don’t know Diddley but with DE and OT I always hear about teams scrutinizing arm length. It’s like QB or WR with height. You don’t want a QB or WR that is 5’6”, but the difference between 6’1” and a 6’5” is not related to height IMO. Please pick an OT in round one based on feet. I would say the same for WR if we go there. Gives a shit about height or length. Give me tape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 9 Author Share Posted April 9 4 hours ago, DieHard said: Think I would be looking at feet instead of arms at the OT position. I know I don’t know Diddley but with DE and OT I always hear about teams scrutinizing arm length. It’s like QB or WR with height. You don’t want a QB or WR that is 5’6”, but the difference between 6’1” and a 6’5” is not related to height IMO. Please pick an OT in round one based on feet. I would say the same for WR if we go there. Gives a shit about height or length. Give me tape. Well if they have short t Rex arms, they can't fight off at length to use their feet too. I am not saying feet doesnt matter, it does a lot but how much does it matter if you are being engaged at a length where feet doesn't help? Think of range on a fighter as an example. You can dance around all you want, but once that jab keeps hitting you, it will have an effect. I want great feet, but you also want arm length to be more 34 inches or so. People can be taught better footwork, you can't teach the arm length. Lamardirts and oldtimer 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted April 9 Share Posted April 9 16 hours ago, kkuenn said: Well if they have short t Rex arms, they can't fight off at length to use their feet too. I am not saying feet doesnt matter, it does a lot but how much does it matter if you are being engaged at a length where feet doesn't help? Think of range on a fighter as an example. You can dance around all you want, but once that jab keeps hitting you, it will have an effect. I want great feet, but you also want arm length to be more 34 inches or so. People can be taught better footwork, you can't teach the arm length. Spinx had 6 inches of reach on Tyson. 😁 No I hear you. It just isn’t the top on my wish list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 9 Author Share Posted April 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iluvhouse24 1,808 Posted April 9 Share Posted April 9 20 hours ago, kkuenn said: Well if they have short t Rex arms, they can't fight off at length to use their feet too. I am not saying feet doesnt matter, it does a lot but how much does it matter if you are being engaged at a length where feet doesn't help? Think of range on a fighter as an example. You can dance around all you want, but once that jab keeps hitting you, it will have an effect. I want great feet, but you also want arm length to be more 34 inches or so. People can be taught better footwork, you can't teach the arm length. Tbh there really is times where the QB escapes pressure and are within inches of a defenders grasp. Those OTs with extremely long arms have a natural advantage there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,207 Posted April 9 Share Posted April 9 1 hour ago, kkuenn said: I like Sinnott but don't think the Chiefs will prioritize him on day two. If he lasted until #131, they might go for him. Doubt that could happen. oldtimer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 9 Share Posted April 9 9 minutes ago, jetlord said: I like Sinnott but don't think the Chiefs will prioritize him on day two. If he lasted until #131, they might go for him. Doubt that could happen. I seriously doubt he gets past day two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,218 Posted April 9 Share Posted April 9 18 minutes ago, SEMO said: I seriously doubt he gets past day two. Yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimer 8,683 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 12 hours ago, xen said: Yep looks more to me like an H Back/ FB with hands type than a actual TE. Ethan Horton 6'4" / 235 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 well since we draft at the end of the first.... would you give 2 of them and a 2nd day pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 3 minutes ago, kkuenn said: well since we draft at the end of the first.... would you give 2 of them and a 2nd day pick? No. Veach has done just fine drafting at the end of rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted April 10 Author Share Posted April 10 Just now, SEMO said: No. Veach has done just fine drafting at the end of rounds. I agree. I do think him not having a first, when he did before, has done well too though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,207 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Never trade two firsts or more for anything less than an elite QB. There's too great of a risk of getting a bust and crippling the franchise for years to come. It might make sense to trade a late first and next years third for that last plug and play LT, but for the Chiefs this year, a move down to get second round WR and OT before #50, for example, would seem better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now