NChiefsCorner 496 Posted April 5, 2015 Share Posted April 5, 2015 #18 - OT Ereck Flowers 6'6" 329 Miami (FL) 5.31 #49 - LB Eric Kendricks 6'0" 232 UCLA 4.59 #80 - WR Phillip Dorsett 5'10" 185 Miami (FL) 4.28 #98 - CB Doran Grant 5'11" 193 Ohio St. 4.37 #118 - WR Chris Conley 6'2" 213 Georgia 4.33 #172 - OC B.J. Finney 6'4" 318 Kansas St. 5.25 #173 - CB/S Justin Cox 6'1" 191 Miss St. 4.30 #193 - CB Nick Marshall 6'1" 207 Auburn 4.62 #217 - RB Marcus Murphy 5'9" 198 Missouri 4.53 #233 - QB Shane Carden 6'2" 218 East Carolina 4.90 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,209 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 Like it. Not sure if Kendricks will still be on the board at #49. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dhitter Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 If we got who you have with the first 3 picks I would be very happy. Overall I would say a solid mock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugsy 225 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 I like the Grant and Carden picks. Also, #18 is way too early for Flowers imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,209 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 I like the Grant and Carden picks. Also, #18 is way too early for Flowers imo. If the Chiefs go O-line in the first round, Flowers may be the best choice available. Who else would you pick assuming Scherff and Collins are already gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West 6,713 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 agree with Jet... Preferences are Scherff, Collins and Flowers in that order....If one of them fell to 18 i would be OK with it. I like the first 3 rounds of the original mock.... w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 I like it. Don't know if Kendricks will be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,209 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 I like it. Don't know if Kendricks will be there. I don't think he will be but who knows? McKinney or Perryman wouldn't be a bad replacement for Kendricks although Perryman's short frame will work against him. Anthony could be available in the third. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 I don't think he will be but who knows? McKinney or Perryman wouldn't be a bad replacement for Kendricks although Perryman's short frame will work against him. Anthony could be available in the third. Agree on Perryman. Disagree on Anthony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NChiefsCorner 496 Posted April 6, 2015 Author Share Posted April 6, 2015 Thanks, I wasn't sure if Kendricks would be there either, but I want the kid on our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West 6,713 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 I felt the same way about DJ a few years back... w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugsy 225 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 If the Chiefs go O-line in the first round, Flowers may be the best choice available. Who else would you pick assuming Scherff and Collins are already gone. If we must go o-line, I'd go Erving before Flowers. Flowers is a good pass blocker but is not a good run blocker imo. Our best player is a RB. There is no flash or mean streak in Flowers. He is a finesse OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 6, 2015 Share Posted April 6, 2015 If we must go o-line, I'd go Erving before Flowers. Flowers is a good pass blocker but is not a good run blocker imo. Our best player is a RB. There is no flash or mean streak in Flowers. He is a finesse OT. Sounds more like Peat. Flowers is number 3 on my oline rankings, after Sherff and Collins. I have Erving at 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilyous2 884 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I like the mock. Not sure that we shouldn't take Cameron Erving in the first round, though. The more I read about him, the more I like, especially his versatility. He could be a fine LT if Fisher doesn't make the leap this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NChiefsCorner 496 Posted April 7, 2015 Author Share Posted April 7, 2015 I read that not only is he a good pass blocker, but he is a mauler blocking in the running game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I read that not only is he a good pass blocker, but he is a mauler blocking in the running game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilyous2 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I read that not only is he a good pass blocker, but he is a mauler blocking in the running game. I read that, too. He can play inside or outside and knows all the defenses, because he was a DE. So, he could step right in at center and direct the O line immediately the first year. The mote I read about him the more I like him. His biggest question mark are his very long arms, making him slower to get an initial hard hit on shorter defensive blockers. But he was already figuring out how to do that last year. He is 6'5". He is willing to play wherever he is needed and at a high level. Very important when injuries hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugsy 225 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Sounds more like Peat. Flowers is number 3 on my oline rankings, after Sherff and Collins. I have Erving at 4. I don't like him much either. Flowers is a technician. I like maulers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugsy 225 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I read that not only is he a good pass blocker, but he is a mauler blocking in the running game. He's not and you need to watch him. He's number 74. He's a good pass blocker but and average run blocker. He's got no mean streak whatsoever and is not a mauler. That said, I'd take him over Peat every time. I'd take Flowers in the second but not in the first. He's a right tackle at best but, is probably going to be a guard. http://draftbreakdown.com/players/ereck-flowers/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 He's not and you need to watch him. He's number 74. He's a good pass blocker but and average run blocker. He's got no mean streak whatsoever and is not a mauler. That said, I'd take him over Peat every time. I'd take Flowers in the second but not in the first. He's a right tackle at best but, is probably going to be a guard. http://draftbreakdown.com/players/ereck-flowers/ You are wrong, Mugs! Watch the film again. Run blocking is where he excels. Pass pro is where he needs some work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kccrow 529 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 You are wrong, Mugs! Watch the film again. Run blocking is where he excels. Pass pro is where he needs some work. I've argued that point already, good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugsy 225 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 You are wrong, Mugs! Watch the film again. Run blocking is where he excels. Pass pro is where he needs some work. I really disagree. He is kind of a soft run blocker and when he gets down field he doesn't find anyone to block. I think he will go in the second round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NChiefsCorner 496 Posted April 10, 2015 Author Share Posted April 10, 2015 Flowers excels in both passing and running, he not only mauls his opponents, he devours them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilyous2 884 Posted April 10, 2015 Share Posted April 10, 2015 Flowers excels in both passing and running, he not only mauls his opponents, he devours them. Cannibalism is an automatic disqualifier in my book. Plus I am told it's illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.