DieHard 2,061 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 I am not sure what took them so long to decline the option. Maybe they were trying to renegotiate? Anyway, There is talk about Philly, but why would Foles go somewhere to be a backup. He should be starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimer 8,686 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 I am not sure what took them so long to decline the option. Maybe they were trying to renegotiate? Anyway, There is talk about Philly, but why would Foles go somewhere to be a backup. He should be starting. I'd say since today is the first day of FA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Okiechief1 425 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Terez paylor was saying that the Chiefs had interest in bringing him back if the money was right. All sorts of speculation going on where he goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spfdchiefsfan 621 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Terez paylor was saying that the Chiefs had interest in bringing him back if the money was right. All sorts of speculation going on where he goes. Where you go to find the news? Don't see much on ESPN or NFL.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West 6,714 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Foles > Hoyer .....Niners should be on the phone. w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Okiechief1 425 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Where you go to find the news? Don't see much on ESPN or NFL.com I got that piece of info off Twitter just doing a search on nick Foles. Don't do much of social media but Twitter is useful for sports news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefmanzada 466 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 We shall never know what could have been if Foles was our current starting QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eraser 722 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Hoyer is more consistent than Foles. Foles was good in his replacement of Smith against the Colts, but the following game was abysmal. The Chiefs will make a move. Maybe they feel Bray is ready to be a backup? Perhaps they will bring in a QB in the draft, but we do know they did not feel Foles was the answer at his current price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Hoyer is consistent all right. Wish we could play him every game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhitter 1,424 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Terez paylor was saying that the Chiefs had interest in bringing him back if the money was right. There are a lot of QB starved teams with more cap space than brains.Someone will overpay for his services meaning the Chiefs will not have him for 2017. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NChiefsCorner 496 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Maybe Andy Reid can turn Robert Griffin's career around, because he's going to be released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefsfan1963 1,101 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Maybe Andy Reid can turn Robert Griffin's career around, because he's going to be released.NOOOOOOOOOOOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 RG3 is brittle and mostly cooked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhataLerror 370 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 He should be starting. Not sure I agree. We'll see soon if the league's other 31 franchises agree with John Dorsey, Andy Reid, and I. (I should write sentences that end that way more often.) Again, what has Nick Foles done since his 2013 season with Chip Kelly? He's got more turnovers than touchdowns from 2014 onward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,209 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 I can't get that image of Foles in the JAX game out of my head. He looked terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCSLC2008 606 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 I can't get that image of Foles in the JAX game out of my head. He looked terrible. And that was with a dropped INT and a deep pass that Hill did a good job tracking an underthrown ball. It was against Jacksonville so I think Reid dialed it back, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eraser 722 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Foles wasn't the solution. Do you think if the Chiefs drop Alex, or Alex is to get hurt the players will ever have confidence in Foles? People in this forum stated they thought the Chiefs should get ride of Alex Smith for Foles? Why should the players get behind that? Alex Smith is flawed. We all know that. At least he has won games. The players can get behind that. Maybe not like Rodgers, Carr, Brady, Roethlisberger, etc.. but a whole lot more than if they had Gabbert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West 6,714 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Chiefs are positioning to draft a QB and maybe sign a free agent.... w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted March 10, 2017 Author Share Posted March 10, 2017 Not sure I agree. We'll see soon if the league's other 31 franchises agree with John Dorsey, Andy Reid, and I. (I should write sentences that end that way more often.) Again, what has Nick Foles done since his 2013 season with Chip Kelly? He's got more turnovers than touchdowns from 2014 onward. True. I guess more of a comment on how bad some of the starters are than how great Foles is. I think that Foles and Daniels are both better than some of the starters out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,220 Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 True. I guess more of a comment on how bad some of the starters are than how great Foles is. I think that Foles and Daniels are both better than some of the starters out there. This is true... probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Back to Philly. Two year deal. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000792637/article/nick-foles-returning-to-eagles-on-twoyear-deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 Bad for Foles, good for Daniels. If I were them, I would be looking for a chance to start. If not this year, then next. A lot of teams have that. Philly doesn't. I hope Daniels gets a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spfdchiefsfan 621 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I hope he comes back to KC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eraser 722 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Chase Daniel wants to go where he can be the starter. Foles signed a two year deal for $11 M, and $7 M of it is guaranteed. That used to be starter pay, but not anymore. It is clearly a move to let him be their back up. The Eagles signed Chase Daniel for twenty one million with twelve of that guaranteed. By releasing him, the Eagles are still on the hook for a lot of money. Daniel can probably be signed for a lot less, since the Eagles are responsible for most of his income. I don't think he will come to KC. You have to wonder why the Eagles lost interest in Daniel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NChiefsCorner 496 Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 Lets move on from Chase Daniels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.