gochiefsgo 380 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2700481-brs-nfl-super-bowl-odds-after-early-free-agency I find this hard to believe even with AS11 as the QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eraser 722 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Bleacher is the Buzzfeed of sports journalism. This is one young man's opinion. He's a Canadian. Consider the source. http://bleacherreport.com/users/979426-brad-gagnon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhataLerror 370 Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2700481-brs-nfl-super-bowl-odds-after-early-free-agency I find this hard to believe even with AS11 as the QB. Most fans are incapable of accurately assessing Smith's actual ability as a quarterback, and that is what people are going to consider first as they predict who might win the Super Bowl. Don't confuse odds with probability. Out of the 17 teams listed above the Chiefs, many of them don't even have the structure in place to support being hot enough to win the requisite three or four games in a row to take the Lombardi Trophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 Most fans are incapable of accurately assessing Smith's actual ability as a quarterback, and that is what people are going to consider first as they predict who might win the Super Bowl. Don't confuse odds with probability. Out of the 17 teams listed above the Chiefs, many of them don't even have the structure in place to support being hot enough to win the requisite three or four games in a row to take the Lombardi Trophy. It looks like they assessed things pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.