Chiefsfan1963 1,101 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I personally don't like this, not because it's the Raiders or even because the Chiefs will face him twice a year (personally I don't think he will be a major factor) but because it sets a bad precedent. Now any player who wishes to leave a team and doesn't mind sitting out a year, by saying they are retired, can do so and even possibly get paid to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMO 6,811 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 What did they have to give Seattle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimer 8,685 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 What did they have to give Seattle? late round pick is all i saw.. I think 5th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefsfan1963 1,101 Posted April 26, 2017 Author Share Posted April 26, 2017 That's the rub, a year or so ago they would have wanted much more for him but when he retired it left Seattle on the hook for some money. Then Oakland comes calling, since he is retired it's not considered tampering, and he says sure I will come back which put Seattle on the hook for his contract unless a trade is worked out. I don't care if it's Seattle, Oakland or Cleveland it's bad practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kychief 239 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 late round pick is all i saw.. I think 5th Think they swapped 5th and 6th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.