Gil 243 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 http://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/article147848749.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimer 8,686 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 good $$ thrown after bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 Question on how this works. So, $8.7 million if we keep in in 2018. What is the hit if we cut him next year? Should be zero if he is healthy, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gil 243 Posted May 3, 2017 Author Share Posted May 3, 2017 Question on how this works. So, $8.7 million if we keep in in 2018. What is the hit if we cut him next year? Should be zero if he is healthy, correct? Not sure, but 8.7 will be a bargain after he puts up 15+ sacks this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West 6,714 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 agree with Gil....Its about production and he is improving year after year. w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 It seems like the right call. I am curious if they use the 6'7" rookie physical freak to pass rush until he learns to play DE. It is what he has done the most of and its kind of fun thinking about a nearly 300 pound edge rusher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetlord 10,209 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 good $$ thrown after bad Not so sure. The Chiefs can still cut Ford after this season. All the extension does is set the pay next year if they keep him. At least that's my understanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 Not sure, but 8.7 will be a bargain after he puts up 15+ sacks this year. 8.7 is a bargain if he racks up 10 sacks. Was a no brainer for KC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimer 8,686 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 8.7 is a bargain if he racks up 10 sacks. Was a no brainer for KC. I disagree..10 Timely sacks yea ok maybe but trash sacks in meaningless games..BFD IMO he caught some teams by surprise because they did not take him seriously..when they did notice him his performance fell off dramatically. He's just a guy & I'm no fan..but thats just me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 I disagree..10 Timely sacks yea ok maybe but trash sacks in meaningless games..BFD IMO he caught some teams by surprise because they did not take him seriously..when they did notice him his performance fell off dramatically. He's just a guy & I'm no fan..but thats just me I don't disagree. That was more of a comment about how much players are paid now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,220 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 I think of is looking to replace him, hence picking up the option after the draft. But it's a no brainer to keep him another year and see how everyone develops. If he doesn't make a jump look at the draft next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.