DieHard 2,061 Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 So our collection of CB sucked major ass last year so the answer is to make it worse? Maybe if PM is the real deal we should trade him as well before he gets expensive so we can get a bunch of picks too. Yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegoatee 1,781 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 I wouldn’t give him a huge contract that he will probably demand. But if the offer was right on the last year of the current contract, you can at least listen to the offers and see if you get an offer that cannot be refused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dksww 484 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Trading Marcus Peters is a huge mistake and if he is traded it should be for a 1st and 2nd round pick. Anything else is unacceptable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palangi 788 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 If it helps the team. I don't care who gets traded as long as it's a smart decision that improves the team. The name on the back of the jersey doesn't matter to me. I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dksww 484 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Nope. Didn't read the article. Don't need to. First off the Chiefs used a 1st round draft pick on the guy. He's been one of the top CB up to this point in his career. Unless he's being traded for a 1st round pick and some more draft picks, he isn't going anywhere. Secondly, the Chiefs own his ass. He doesn't want to resign with the Chiefs...they franchise tag him when it gets to that point. Once he gets the tag, then and ONLY then do you trade away a top tier CB talent. You don't trade him when he is on a rookie contract. Not when he's performing as one of the best. 1000% this. Unless it's an absolute Kings ransom there's no way you trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palangi 788 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 1000% this. Unless it's an absolute Kings ransom there's no way you trade him. exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dablueguy 0 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Pete Sweeney @pgsween FollowingFollowing @pgsween More If you think there’s a zero percent chance the #Chiefs trade Marcus Peters, you haven’t been paying attention. 4:54 PM - 19 Feb 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend of AC 269 Posted February 20, 2018 Author Share Posted February 20, 2018 Some of you are acting like Peters is untouchable - he’s not. I’ll trust the judgement of Veach and Reid regardless of what happens, but if we can get a decent 1st rounder for Peters I wouldn’t be pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,605 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Some of you are acting like Peters is untouchable - he’s not. I’ll trust the judgement of Veach and Reid regardless of what happens, but if we can get a decent 1st rounder for Peters I wouldn’t be pissed. Makes no sense to trade him just for a decent first rounder. We can get the option next year and tags are available after that. That is a lot of control to give away for just a first rounder to hope and see if ths t pick works out and if we spent it on CB just to replace him, we really will not upgrade if at all, but could down grade a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dablueguy 0 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 To quote a great song's first line: These things don't get planted by accident. My own theory, just trying to logic it out, as to why it's suddenly appearing, and gaining steam. They started negotiations on a long term contract for Peters. He either is not interested, or they are so far apart, that one side or the other think it's an impossible bridge to overcome, and is putting the trade possibility out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,220 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 I think the Amerson signing has more to do with Mitchell and Gaines being free agents than it does the front office putting Peters on the block.../shrug BUT if Peters must be traded I’d also what a early pick and a player. Maybe: Packers get: Peters Chiefs get: #14 Jordy Nelson Or Seahawks get: Peters Chiefs get: #18 Sherman Both of those guys may be hitting the street. Hawks tried to trade sherman last year with no takers. Neither one have been the same player they were earlier in their careers. If this was a player and a pick trade I'd want a much younger player preferably one on a nice contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend of AC 269 Posted February 20, 2018 Author Share Posted February 20, 2018 To quote a great song's first line: These things don't get planted by accident. My own theory, just trying to logic it out, as to why it's suddenly appearing, and gaining steam. They started negotiations on a long term contract for Peters. He either is not interested, or they are so far apart, that one side or the other think it's an impossible bridge to overcome, and is putting the trade possibility out there. I agree with you. Like politics, when something is leaked in the NFL you can bet it wasn’t by accident. Regardless of the circumstances, it would seem the Chiefs may have leaked this as a “feeler out” type inquiry to see if there are any nibblers. We do know that Veach isn’t afraid to make bold moves if nothing else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora "continues to hear" that LCB Marcus Peters "may not be long" for Kansas City. La Canfora is not the first to mention a potential Peters trade, and he expects that chatter to "intensify" at the NFL Combine. The Chiefs were left in horrible salary-cap condition by fired GM John Dorsey and may not believe they can fit a forthcoming Peters extension onto their books. For 2018, however, Peters is signed for just $1.74 million. Ideally, the Chiefs would keep Peters for at least one more year, and perhaps revisit a trade next offseason. Read somewhere KC has 85 million in cap space in 2019? So not sure why the press keeps pointing to CAP Hell? Can't think of anyone more wrong than LaConfora on a consistent basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balto 723 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 How about this.... Cardinals are retooling and some are saying that Tyrann Mathieu will need to restructure or might get cut.....also Patrick Peterson has stated he doesn’t want to be around for another rebuild. Cards get: Peters, young top CB that fits the new HC style Chiefs get: Honey Badger, age 25 2018 cost $11M 2019 cost $11M Can be cut after 2019 without much cap hit 2020 cost $11M 2012 cost $9.5M Patrick Peterson, age 27 2018 cost $11.25M 2019 cost $11.25M 2020 cost $12.55M YES that’s over $20M in cap we just took on BUT we have the room so why not? Your new secondary: Peterson, Fuller, Amerson Berry, Mathieu Can you imagine Berry and Honey Badger as our safeties? Lolololol. WOW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calichief 3,016 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Would yall take that for Kelce too? And what about Hill?Exactly. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sith13 1,746 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Would yall take that for Kelce too? And what about Hill? I would probably take that for either guy. A TE or WR is a lot more easy to replace than a solid CB and even the 4th overall is intruding enough for one of them, let alone a decent slot WR prospect. I wouldn't consider it for Peters though, unless he wants out immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend of AC 269 Posted February 20, 2018 Author Share Posted February 20, 2018 This story is starting to gather steam. My guess is that what DBG said is correct. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/02/20/more-talk-emerges-of-a-potential-marcus-peters-trade/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimer 8,689 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 time will tell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dksww 484 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Some of you are acting like Peters is untouchable - he’s not. I’ll trust the judgement of Veach and Reid regardless of what happens, but if we can get a decent 1st rounder for Peters I wouldn’t be pissed. I would be. The chances of getting a player as good as Peters is very small. It literally makes 0 sense to trade him, so I fully expect the dumbass Chiefs to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dksww 484 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2018/2/20/17029928/why-the-chiefs-could-feasibly-trade-marcus-peters-they-shouldnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend of AC 269 Posted February 20, 2018 Author Share Posted February 20, 2018 https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2018/2/20/17029928/why-the-chiefs-could-feasibly-trade-marcus-peters-they-shouldnt Good article. Like I said, whatever happens, I’ll trust the judgement of Reid and Veach. Also, what we don’t know is if Marcus wants out of KC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iluvhouse24 1,808 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 I would be. The chances of getting a player as good as Peters is very small. It literally makes 0 sense to trade him, so I fully expect the dumbass Chiefs to do it. If they are shopping him theres a reason. I still find it unlikely to happen now. But if there is truth to it, there is various reasons. Its not just because they dont think they can resign him. He may be more of a problem in the locker room than we realize. I certainly hope that if he is moved, they get a haul back. Maybe they could talk Cleveland out of that number 4 pick and draft Minkah with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dksww 484 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 If they are shopping him theres a reason. I still find it unlikely to happen now. But if there is truth to it, there is various reasons. Its not just because they dont think they can resign him. He may be more of a problem in the locker room than we realize. I certainly hope that if he is moved, they get a haul back. Maybe they could talk Cleveland out of that number 4 pick and draft Minkah with it. I said it earlier, it would need to be an absolute King's Ransom in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dksww 484 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Good article. Like I said, whatever happens, I’ll trust the judgement of Reid and Veach. Also, what we don’t know is if Marcus wants out of KC. You trust Andy Reid now? I find that hard to believe. I sure AF don't. Veach hasn't had a full off-season to judge him yet. I have liked some of the moves he's made in season and now. Everybody is ok with trading away Alex Smith and now M. Peters until we go 5-11 next year. chiefsp trusting Andy Reid...LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefensiveMan 758 Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Peters might get traded. Chiefs are trying to avoid paying him and get a 1st rounder in return. Not sure I agree. Trust the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.