Chiefswinitall 60 Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 https://clutchpoints.com/rams-rumors-chiefs-wanted-robert-quinn-in-trade-for-marcus-peters/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dablueguy 0 Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Don't blame them. But the Rams weren't that dumb. So the Chiefs settled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KC Warpaint 3,238 Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Don't blame them. But the Rams weren't that dumb. So the Chiefs settled. LOS ANGELES -- The Los Angeles Rams agreed to acquire All-Pro cornerback Marcus Peters from the Kansas City Chiefs on Friday, a move that was first reported by ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter. Details of the trade, which won't be processed until the start of the new league year on March 14, have yet to be disclosed. But the Chiefs are expected to receive a package of draft picks, not players, in return, according to Schefter's sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kychief 239 Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Damn he's talented..would take a helluva lot of compensation to make it worthwhile..doubt the chiefs get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPPT1974 21 Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Yeah as really hope it does not hurt the team in the long run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,605 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 Well maybe they won't get him to rework a contract and end up cutting him any ways lol. Then we sign him! Weird though as they must know he is staying or why not get the cap space for him by trading him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefsfan1963 1,101 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 LOS ANGELES -- The Los Angeles Rams agreed to acquire All-Pro cornerback Marcus Peters from the Kansas City Chiefs on Friday, a move that was first reported by ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter. Details of the trade, which won't be processed until the start of the new league year on March 14, have yet to be disclosed. But the Chiefs are expected to receive a package of draft picks, not players, in return, according to Schefter's sources. I love it when someone is referred to as something they were in the past. He was All Pro in 2015 and 16 what was he in 2017? It's like a person who left the ministry in 2014 still being referred to as a preacher. If the were saying past All Pro it would be a different story. Currently he is not an All Pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefswinitall 60 Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 .https://twitter.com/ChiefsInsider could be reason why the compensation hasn't been released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefsfan1963 1,101 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 .https://twitter.com/ChiefsInsider could be reason why the compensation hasn't been released. This is why I don't lose my damn mind when shit is announced without it being official. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamardirts 2,114 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 If they won't part with Quinn then I'm afraid the rumors of no 1st round pick are true. starting to think we get a handful of mid round picks....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sith13 1,746 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 If they won't part with Quinn then I'm afraid the rumors of no 1st round pick are true. starting to think we get a handful of mid round picks....... On the other hand if Quinn was ever on the table it would simply be to replace a 1st. The fact that he's untouchable makes me think we get a 1st and we'll see what else is there. Otherwise it's a big problem in the FO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.