Shadow 10 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 Just came across my bleecher report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 Smart trade for the Browns. A guy like Landry will be a young qbs best friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 And they just scooped up Tyrod Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefensiveMan 758 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 That Dorsey man means business! And another trade for Browns: Packers have informed CB Damarious Randall that he is being traded to Cleveland (like everybody else), per source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liquidfriend 1,151 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 Dorsey trying to replicate what he did in KC there. Tyrod Taylor for a 3rd either means they are taking on a major project like Darnold or Allen, or skipping QB completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palangi 788 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 Dorsey trying to replicate what he did in KC there. Tyrod Taylor for a 3rd either means they are taking on a major project like Darnold or Allen, or skipping QB completely. or developing Kiser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAChiefsFan79 136 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 or developing Kiser Nope. Just seen he's part of the trade to GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balto 723 Posted March 9, 2018 Share Posted March 9, 2018 Damn sucks to be Landry.....no way he agrees to a long term deal with them lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIChiefsFan 262 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Dorsey thinks he is playing Madden, man he is making a lot of moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAChiefsFan79 136 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Damn sucks to be Landry.....no way he agrees to a long term deal with them lol If the Browns are drafting a QB with 1st round then picking up Taylor is just a stop gap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 I like what he is doing. If he can turn in a winning club in Cleveland, he is the man. I hope he does. They have won 10 games once in their 18 years of existence. That is very sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen 1,010,220 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 That Dorsey man means business! And another trade for Browns: Packers have informed CB Damarious Randall that he is being traded to Cleveland (like everybody else), per source. They flipped him for deshone kizer and looks like they'll swap late round picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggjliv4 1,292 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Saying they may extend Landry to be one of the highest paid WR in league. Dorsey knows how how to collect talent, too bad he may be repeating the pattern of paying players out the ass per usual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHard 2,061 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Hell, I would tell him show me. I don’t know if he is worth that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 They are going after Bell now. If they it for the 1st overall pick they are dumb. No source, just reading other boards etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Saying they may extend Landry to be one of the highest paid WR in league. Dorsey knows how how to collect talent, too bad he may be repeating the pattern of paying players out the ass per usual They have a ton of cap space. They probably could pay the guaranteed off this year and cut him later on down the road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KC Warpaint 3,234 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 when i first read about this trade, i said there go the browns being the browns wondering if they gave up the 1st or 4th pick (stupid). When i saw it was for two 3rd rounders man that was a pretty savvy move on dorsey's part. Now they have to take a QB at the one or at #4 because tyrod ain't the long term answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KC Warpaint 3,234 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 They are going after Bell now. If they it for the 1st overall pick they are dumb. No source, just reading other boards etc no way the steelers let him go to a division rival Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamardirts 2,114 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Glad they traded for Landry and not us. He was always good at getting talent but made a mess at keeping talent. I'm not a big fan of Landry so I'm glad he's not available anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balto 723 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 no way the steelers let him go to a division rival No way the Browns would trade the #1 or #4 for him either. They could just take the kid from Penn state. I’m guessing that #33 is in play for Bell though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkuenn 3,597 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 No way the Browns would trade the #1 or #4 for him either. They could just take the kid from Penn St. I’m guessing that #33 is in play for Bell though. This is what I would do. Draft the rb 1 and a Qb at 4. Just reading other boards and such is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sith13 1,746 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 I don't see Browns picking the RB if they are sold on a QB. The franchise cannot fail at the same position for the 100th time and won't be taking risks. Barkley will probably last until #4 and if not they probably won't care. Trading for Bell makes too much sense for Dorsey with his 100 million $ cap space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soonerborn77 276 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 I don't see Browns picking the RB if they are sold on a QB. The franchise cannot fail at the same position for the 100th time and won't be taking risks. Barkley will probably last until #4 and if not they probably won't care. Trading for Bell makes too much sense for Dorsey with his 100 million $ cap space. There is no one QB that has separated themselves, they can take Barkley and easily get one of the qb’s they have targeted at 4 and use all that cap space on defense and oline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mloe68 1,521 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Dorsey trying to replicate what he did in KC there. Tyrod Taylor for a 3rd either means they are taking on a major project like Darnold or Allen, or skipping QB completely. Without Andy Reid he’s going to find it a lot more difficult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisChief-Maker 135 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Browns would be utterly stupid to not take Barkley first. Those QB's are a much of a muchness imo. If it was last years class and they had Watson and Mahomes to pick from then fair enough, but Darnold, Rosen, Allen, Mayfield and Jackson? SMH Has bust written all that group. Them also having the fourth pick, and Indi not likely to go for a QB, means only NY is likely to pick a QB ahead of them. So needless to say I don't see why all these "experts" are crying over Dorsey potentially picking Barkley first. Now don't get me wrong, Barkley is hardly Faulk 2#, but put that kid alongside Gordan and Landry and all of a sudden the Browns are looking serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.