Jump to content

2 postions in draft didn't fill


Recommended Posts

 
 
 
 

To be honest, I think D was much more pressing. We have a pretty good set of WRs. Between DAT, Robinson and Chesson we should be fine in the slot and 4 WRs sets.

DAT shouldn’t even be included as a wr. Outside of special teams his contribution is a jet sweep and a screen pass. I still have no idea why he was signed again. We have too much talent at wr for a gadget player with no position to be a factor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He runs nice routes. Wilson got most of those looks. But I like Robinson on the field when we go 3 WRs. He, Hill and Watkins can play slot. Mix and match how ever they want depending on who they want to pick on.

 

I know Robinson is taller than a typical slot, but he would be fine there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 

I think the TE sport was taken care ofin free agency. Tim Wright and Jace Amaro.

1. Defensive End.

2. TightEnd.

 

Offensive Tackle?

 

Only so many picks.    When is that date when teams release players?  Right before training camp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

DAT shouldn’t even be included as a wr. Outside of special teams his contribution is a jet sweep and a screen pass. I still have no idea why he was signed again. We have too much talent at wr for a gadget player with no position to be a factor.

 

He's not really different than a camp body in terms the contract. 1-year no guarantees deal close to vet minimum. If they kept him long term I would be worried but at this point they might be just keeping him around as the return man in case of some camp problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 

He's not really different than a camp body in terms the contract. 1-year no guarantees deal close to vet minimum. If they kept him long term I would be worried but at this point they might be just keeping him around as the return man in case of some camp problems.

Dave Toub loves him. That’s why he’s back. I’ll bet Toub gets 1-2 veto votes on cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
  • Create New...