Kareem Hunt faces more than baseline six-game suspension

[KC Warpaint 3,251]

 

• 
• By Ian Rapoport
• NFL Network Insider

 

Recently released Kansas City Chiefs running back Kareem Hunt will learn his immediate fate on Monday at 4 p.m. ET when the waiver wire comes out. Hunt might not learn until the offseason when he'll be allowed to step on a field for an NFL team again.

That wait is expected to end with a lengthy suspension.

According to sources with direct knowledge of the situation, Hunt faces more than the baseline six-game suspension for violation of the NFL's personal conduct policy. The league also has been investigating an incident involving Hunt allegedly punching a man in the face at an Ohio resort in June. The NFL is believed to have found enough from that incident to add to Hunt's discipline.

Since penalties for two incidents aren't likely to be served independently of each other -- and because the clock on a suspension doesn't begin when a player is on the Reserve/Commissioner Exempt List -- Hunt could sit out not only the rest of the 2018 season, but well into the 2019 season.

One option Hunt is considering is serving a potential NFL suspension as soon as possible, sources say. Basically, he would admit wrongdoing and likely serve six or more games rather than remain on the Commissioner Exempt List.

Of course, this depends on a team signing him to play, which is not a given.

This all played out Friday when TMZ published a surveillance video from a Cleveland hotel showing Hunt shoving and kicking a woman. The Chiefs released him after stating he lied to them by greatly minimizing the incident. He later apologized in a statement: "I deeply regret what I did. I hope to move on from this."

The NFL, which never closed its investigation into Hunt, hopes to move quickly. It likely will make another attempt to reach the victims -- there were multiple attempts previously by email and phone to no avail -- and Hunt also will be interviewed.

One complication could be if Cleveland Police Dept. begins investigating again; that could prolong the NFL's investigation and disciplinary action. While the video was made public Friday, the outcry was about more than just Hunt's actions. Neither the NFL, nor the Chiefs, had seen the video before it was released.

A league source said the NFL asked the hotel for it twice and was told the hotel would only release it to law enforcement. There was a public records request in June that included the body cam footage and 911 calls, but not the tape.

The league also asked Cleveland police for it and were told they didn't have it.

According to sergeant and public information officer Jennifer Ciaccia of the Cleveland Police Department, she doesn't believe anyone with the department saw the video, either. Officers filed two police reports, but the video was not part of the investigation file.

It was a misdemeanor case, she said, and detectives don't follow up as they do with felonies. In other words, detectives didn't go back for the video. They referred victims to the city prosecutor to file charges.

The victims have not yet filed charges. The statute of limitations does allow victims to still file charges in the wake of the videos, but Monday is the earliest that can happen, Ciaccia said.

[PAChiefsFan79 136]

1 hour ago, KC Warpaint said:

According to sergeant and public information officer Jennifer Ciaccia of the Cleveland Police Department, she doesn't believe anyone with the department saw the video, either. Officers filed two police reports, but the video was not part of the investigation file.

It was a misdemeanor case, she said, and detectives don't follow up as they do with felonies. In other words, detectives didn't go back for the video. They referred victims to the city prosecutor to file charges.

The victims have not yet filed charges. The statute of limitations does allow victims to still file charges in the wake of the videos, but Monday is the earliest that can happen, Ciaccia said.

I find this part interesting. Police don't follow up on video surveillance for misdemeanor crimes? WTF not? It's still a crime and would be easy to make their case regardless on the level of the crime. 

 

Guess it's CPD's way to brush aside cases involving high profile people. 

[Mloe68 1,521]

36 minutes ago, PAChiefsFan79 said:

I find this part interesting. Police don't follow up on video surveillance for misdemeanor crimes? WTF not? It's still a crime and would be easy to make their case regardless on the level of the crime. 

 

Guess it's CPD's way to brush aside cases involving high profile people. 

This seems like a big part of the issue. The police basically are saying no big deal here and don't care about the video because nobody was really hurt and no charges were filed. So it really doesn't create a sense of urgency from the league to find out what happened. And the Chiefs sit Kareem down and he tells them a story about how he had no role in this at all. This probably goes away all together until someone figures out there's a video and as the report says the Chiefs sat down with Kareem again and basically said "are you really telling us everything." Who knows what the hell the league is thinking when they tell the Chiefs not to pursue the video. I actually think this will come out pretty soon. It really wouldn't have taken much to find out Kareem was lying. But if there was just nobody that seemed to care at this point it was probably easy to just take his word for it.  

[NChiefsCorner 496]

I'll be surprised if a lawsuit is not filed, no charges were filed, nobody was hurt, it has been 9 months later and all of a sudden this video leaks out, who is set to gain by this happening.

[Chiefsfan1963 1,101]

1 hour ago, PAChiefsFan79 said:

I find this part interesting. Police don't follow up on video surveillance for misdemeanor crimes? WTF not? It's still a crime and would be easy to make their case regardless on the level of the crime. 

 

Guess it's CPD's way to brush aside cases involving high profile people. 

Personally I believe cops give these guys free passes. Remember Talib in Texas?

My daughter's house was broken into and the were burgled in Port Orchard WA. The cops came took their statements and left. No fingerprints, no investigation whatsoever. They even told them there wasn't much they could do so don't expect much.

I'm not a cop and I know they have a shit load of work to do but I would like to know what justifies an investigation and what doesn't.

[Mloe68 1,521]

5 minutes ago, NChiefsCorner said:

I'll be surprised if a lawsuit is not filed, no charges were filed, nobody was hurt, it has been 9 months later and all of a sudden this video leaks out, who is set to gain by this happening.

TMZ gets ratings and hence advertisers by blowing up big stories, whoever had the videotape no doubt got paid a hefty sum for it, if there was a fan of an opposing team that wanted to stick it to us involved they gain indirectly which explains timing of it..There's plenty of people who gained something. But Kareem really has no recourse here. He did it. If anything it might open up the possibility of a civil suit by the girl in the video which I think is bogus as I have no sympathy for her because she put herself in this. 

[dksww 484]

1 hour ago, PAChiefsFan79 said:

I find this part interesting. Police don't follow up on video surveillance for misdemeanor crimes? WTF not? It's still a crime and would be easy to make their case regardless on the level of the crime. 

 

Guess it's CPD's way to brush aside cases involving high profile people. 

The Police didn't make an arrest based on what happened so it was up to the girl involved to press charges, which she never did.

If she ever talks to the media we would know more.